

Not too long ago...I was shopping in an internationally known discount store when an extremely attractive, middle-aged couple walked passed me. The gentleman was distinguished looking and impeccably dressed. The lady, at his side, was stunning. To say that she was beautiful would be an understatement. She was absolutely gorgeous. Her photograph belongs on the cover of a fashion magazine.
It was not, however, their combined beauty that caught my eyes. It was the very large revolver that was holstered to the man's belt. At first, I thought to myself that he must be an off-duty policeman...or perhaps an on-duty, plain-clothes detective - maybe even an FBI or other federal law enforcement agent. But there was no badge...no shield of any kind...in plain sight...attached anywhere to his clothing.
I, therefore, immediately approached a manager to advise him that a man with a gun was strolling throughout the store. After all...just because the couple was spectacular by appearance...didn't mean they couldn't be the "Bonnie and Clyde" of the "jet set." However...when I described to the manager what I had seen - that is, the gun - he calmly noted that I was in a state, which has an "open carry" law...and, as such...allows anyone with a licensed firearm...to carry it...unconcealed. That being said...it had startled me when I had observed an individual...having a gun parked on his hip...who was not wearing a police officer's uniform...or who was not - at the very least - displaying a cop's badge.
A number of days later...I was making a purchase in a convenience store... in the same state...when another couple entered. They were wearing sweatsuits...and it was evident that they had just come from working out...perhaps at their local fitness center or possibly from jogging in a public park. Both the man and woman - I would guess in their mid to late twenties - had pistols strapped to their waists. I, of course, was now aware of the "open carry" law, so I was not shocked by the two guns. But although I may not have been spooked by the pair of weapons...many of the other customers in the store...including the two clerks behind the counter...were obviously...quite frightened...and I...admittedly...was still concerned.
When the young couple left...there was a whole lot of negative conversation about the guns. Much of the criticism included the discomfort that was forced upon the men, women and children as they were buying their 6-packs of beer, quarts of milk and chocolate candy bars.
It is clearly understood...that both of the couples noted above...were more than likely...law abiding citizens...who presumably had permits...and therefore ...Constitutionally...were allowed to carry their sidearms into the retail establishments. But those four people...and others like them...who wear guns on their person as if they lived in the wild west of the late 1800s...don't they have any regard for the sensitive feelings and psychological emotions of other people? The youngsters - the little kids - not to mention the adults...both male and female...were genuinely shaken up and understandably nervous by seeing guns inside a convenience store. The anxiety in that shop was intense, as most people don't know about "open carry" gun laws.
Just because the United States Constitution provides a Second Amendment right so Americans can own firearms...and just because 44 of our 50 states recognize some form of "open carry" law...businesses such as department and discount stores...supermarkets...convenience stores...and other public establishments...should consider that when most Americans view a gun...they expect it to be carried by someone wearing a badge. There have been too many times - in recent years - where a deranged madman has entered a school...a fast-food restaurant...a movie theatre...or other public place...and has shot and murdered innocent people. With "open carry" laws...how can anyone know...if the person standing next to you on line in the convenience store...is there to buy a pack of chewing gum...or if he is going to kill you? And with a dozen or more people making a quick purchase...are they all thinking the same thing? Is that man with the gun...simply buying lottery tickets...or is he going to shoot to death...each and everyone of us?

A recent Quinnipiac University poll indicates that 66 percent...two-thirds of the people surveyed nationwide...call the Starbucks no-guns request..."a good idea." Among individuals who live in a household where a gun is present...52 percent support Starbucks' position. And the bottom line is...an overwhelming majority - nearly three-quarters of the people surveyed - 72 percent...say that Starbucks' decision to ask customers...to keep their guns away from the coffee shops...won't make any difference...as to where they buy their coffee.
According to a poll released by The Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Violence...most Americans are opposed to "open carry" laws, which permit people to visibly carry loaded guns in public. The survey reveals that 52 percent of the people polled...are against "people in general"...who are openly possessing loaded firearms in public locations. Only 44 percent are in favor of "open carry."
If an American citizen...lawfully wants to carry a gun...loaded or unloaded...in a state that permits it...he or she is protected by the Constitution of that particular state. But must you carry it in to a store? If the business is held up...are you going to risk your life and draw your gun on the robber? If you do...you're a fool. If it's your desire...your thing...to carry a gun...and the law allows it...then no matter what Howard Schultz... I...or anybody else says...you're going to do it anyway. But have some consideration for others. Leave your firearm - unloaded - and locked in the glove compartment of your car. Think of other people. Think of the children...who may get the wrong impression...when they observe you wearing a gun. Just the appearance of such a weapon...could emotionally scar a kid... for life. Don't put people in unnecessary fear. Respect others.
I praise and commend Howard Schultz...and the board of directors of Starbucks...for invoking a policy...that their coffee shops be gun-free zones. Starbucks - as any business in America - has the freedom to insist that guns are not allowed on their property...and all retail establishments throughout the United States...should follow the path...of Starbucks.
And that's The Controversy for today.
I'm Gary B. Duglin.
"We'll talk again."
The Controversy is a publication of GBD Productions. Founder and Editor-In-Chief of The Controversy is Gary B. Duglin.
The Controversy will make an effort to publish a new commentary every Sunday. Unscheduled essays may appear, from time to time, on other days as well.
Please express your opinions in the comment box below. You do not have to register your name and you can remain anonymous if you prefer. The Controversy wants to know your views on the essay above and on any other commentaries written on this blog. Just click on the word "Comments" below and write your thoughts in the box that appears. Make sure please that when you finish your statement that you click on the word "Publish." Thank you for your thoughts and thank you for reading The Controversy.
No comments:
Post a Comment